What AEO is, and why it is not SEO
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) means preparing your content so that an answer engine — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or Google's summaries — uses it when composing an answer. It does not replace SEO or compete with it: SEO wants someone to click your link; AEO wants you cited even when nobody clicks.
What changes when the answer stops being a list of links?
For twenty years the search engine returned ten links and the work was to be near the top. Today a growing share of queries ends in a written answer, with two or three sources cited underneath.
In that setting, being result number four means nothing. Either your content is in the answer, or you do not exist for that query.
How is it actually different from SEO?
They share fundamentals — useful content, a fast site, clean structure — but differ in the goal and, above all, in how success is measured.
- Goal: SEO pursues the visit; AEO pursues the mention inside the answer.
- Unit of work: SEO optimises the page; AEO optimises the passage that can be extracted and quoted.
- Format: SEO tolerates preamble before the answer; AEO penalises it, because the engine wants the answer, not the introduction.
- Measurement: SEO has positions and impressions; AEO has no ranking yet, and is measured by asking.
What makes content citable?
An answer engine needs to extract a fragment that stands on its own, away from its original context. That imposes a fairly specific way of writing.
- The title is the question someone types, not a slogan.
- The conclusion comes before the argument, in a paragraph that makes sense in isolation.
- Every heading is itself a question, and its section answers it completely.
- Claims are concrete and attributable; vague statements do not get quoted.
- Structured markup tells the engine what the page is and who stands behind it.
What does not work?
Tactics inherited from older SEO do not merely fail to help: they get in the way. Repeating the keyword, padding the text to hit a word count, and the generic trends piece that contains not one checkable claim.
Answer engines lean on content that adds something not already in twenty other places. If your article could be rewritten from the other results, there is no reason to cite you.
How do you measure whether it is working?
There is no equivalent of Search Console yet. What you can do is ask: write down the queries that matter to you, put them to the main engines regularly, and record whether you appear, how you are described, and who gets cited instead.
It is less precise than a search position, but it measures what actually matters: whether the engine treats you as a source when someone asks about your field.
Where to start
This article is written according to what it describes: a question for a title, the answer in the first block, headings that are questions, and article markup. You can check it in the page source.
- Write down the five real questions your customers ask before buying from you.
- Answer each one on its own page, with the conclusion in the first paragraph.
- Add structured markup and confirm your site is crawlable.
- Put those five queries to the engines today, so you have a baseline.